Skip to main content

Gloria Vanderbilt’s Stomach Cancer, Could Anything Have Been Done?

Photo by Pixabay from Pexels


When someone reaches the “ripe” old age of 95 and dies, we can feel good that they’ve had a long life. But in medicine we see far too much ageism, decisions being made based on age. A twenty-year-old may get a surgery that an 80-year-old is refused. For stomach cancer, a recent analysis found that elderly patients were as good as younger patients at recovering afterward.

But stomach cancer is usually found too late to do anything for any patient. The early symptoms of stomach cancer are so much like heartburn that a patient may let symptoms advance for a decade or more before seeking medical help. Gloria Vanderbilt’s stomach cancer was already advanced, meaning that it had progressed beyond the stomach. Even at earlier stages, the survival rate for patients is 18%. Beyond that stage, virtually no medical intervention could have prolonged her life more than six months.

It is common to also look at her life and wonder if something Gloria Vanderbilt did along the way may have increased her risk of cancer. No, she probably didn’t get all her fruits and vegetables, but having more of those doesn’t prevent stomach cancer. (They do help with many other cancers.) What about coffee? Americans drinking coffee do have a higher risk. But that risk pales in comparison to smoking. Images of Gloria Vanderbilt smoking are so iconic they have been made into posters for sale.

There are newer treatments for stomach cancer, but surgery remains the main treatment. We need to realize that a societal acceptance of heartburn as “normal” and treatable by antacids has a real risk of allowing stomach cancer to progress to the untreatable stage as it did with Gloria Vanderbilt.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Godaddy and the Russian Mob, or why maloneymedical.com is now a scam.

I apologize to those of you who have been confused by my sudden interest in promoting Viagra. It’s not me. It’s the Russian Mob using maloneymedical.com to rip people off. Yes, I’m taking legal action. But the law is slow and people are getting hurt and confused. (My current website is naturopathicmaine.com , but if you’re confused, just email me. Or use your phone for what it was intended and give me a call.) Please don’t assume I’ve decided that erectile dysfunction is my guiding passion going forward. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. In November of 2017, I stopped paying on maloneymedical.com . It was an old domain, and I foolishly thought because it had my own name in the title it would be worthless to anyone else. How wrong I was. Godaddy auctioned off my domain to the highest bidder. He took maloneymedical.com , added a fake copy of my old website using Wordpress, hosted the new fake website on Amazon, and tried to hide himself by using Godaddy’s evil twin D...

What Is the Deal With Fopobiacne Secrets? Scam? Sadly, Yes.

I just had another "random" person mention Fopobiacne Secrets on my comments page today. Since it seemed spammy, I deleted the comment. But it made me think that Fopobiacne Secrets is paying people to spam the internet with this product. So I decided to go looking and see what's going on. First, going directly to their official website is a weird experience. It's not a secure site, and hasn't been verified online, so it feels sketchy (I know, I use google, and I do so because they're verified and have the best security on the planet).  Most product pages feature a one page click through process. You see the product, read the reviews, and buy or pass on the product. Not on the Fopoiacne Secrets page. The top of the page warns "This is not for everyone!" then in the text they say, " Fopobiacne Secrets  is the best choice for you." So which is it? Not for everyone or the best choice for everyone? If you press the continue button, you...

Will Vaccine Herd Immunity Eradicate More Illnesses?

The concept of herd immunity leading to disease eradication is simple. More vaccines, less disease, right up to the point of everybody gets vaccines, no more disease. But that's simply wrong. It's not because herd immunity doesn't help decrease disease, but because the idea of herd immunity is based on too-simple math. We can all get the idea easily. In a homogenous human population, there should exist a level of vaccination at which no more disease can be transmitted. Notice the fatal flaw is not in the concept, it's in the word "homogenous." Human populations will never be like bricks or milk cartons. You can't just line them up and expect everyone to be the same. So the concept of hitting a magic point and having that point mean no more disease is a mathematical graph, not a human reality. But it's such a nice graph. You can see a version here . The more you vaccinate, the fewer cases. But if you look at that graph, you see something like m...