Skip to main content

When Did It Become Normal To Be Harassed Online? Why Do We Tolerate Trolls?

Yes, we shouldn't feed the trolls. But why are they here?

When you think about going online, you probably want to find something, buy something, or connect with someone. Chances are good that you're not looking to be sexually or emotionally harassed.

But we are. Half of us have been harassed online. One in five of us has received death threats. stalking, or continual sexual harassment. It's just normal.

Is it really normal? 

Sure, you might think. It's just like the public street. Crazy people can come up to you and harass you. That's life.

The internet is not a public street. It's a business. If you go to a website, someone created that website. Someone else hosts that website. There's a big company that provides security for that website. Why do all these people, who have a vested interest in you staying online, ignore the harassment?

You pay someone to provide you with that website access. 

So do you want to keep paying for people to harass you? No. You likely don't. Maybe it's time to have general do not harass lists the same way we have do not call lists. Yes, I know these are largely ineffective (as my phone has many unnecessary calls). But I can, if I wait through a robocall message, usually press a key that gets me off the list. Yes, we can block people online, we can mute them. We should be able to voluntarily opt out of any online interaction. They can speak, but we don't have to listen. Should that be the solution?

But the internet isn't a phone line, it's a community.

The goal of any website is to provide a community of buyers or friends, people who share a common interest. It's like club, a church, a garden party. You share your photos, meet with old friends, and catch up on one another's lives. Of course reviews of good restaurants and the best price on groceries are part of that exchange, but the sense is that you're among people who should be following a certain level of social conduct.

Imagine if you drove to a bank or grocery store. You go in and someone starts harassing you. It's in the business' best interest to not have you harassed. Nobody in the grocery store is going to start freaking out about that man's First Amendment rights to harass you. He's on private property, and he needs to leave. We all recognize that his (and we are talking about men here, folks, overwhelmingly) rights to speak are secondary to your right to not be intimidated, insulted and put in fear for your life.

The only thing that needs to happen online is what would happen outside the grocery store. That harassing individual would be identified and told to make himself scarce. He'd no longer be welcome in the store. Even if he tried to sneak back in, he'd be recognized. We need to get rid of online anonymity. 

Won't get rid of anonymity stifle free expression? 

Not at all. People can be crazy. You just get to see them coming. 

Take it from some of my old skeptic pals. P.Z. Meyers and Steve Novella manage to do a great job of spreading their particular brand of insane hatred while fully identifying themselves. P.Z. runs a lunatic fringe group of anonymous people who claim to be scientists but who seem to only know four letter words. Steve just parrots him and then claims he's not just an incredibly bored human being who is one step short of poking himself in the eye for entertainment. The Amazing Randi used his very public statements of derision as a smokescreen to hide his own illegal lover from prying eyes.  Their local Maine leader (the one who got them to gang up on me a decade ago) is a convicted pedophile. Yep, that's the kind of people we're talking about. Real sweethearts. Free expression is still free if you have the courage to identify yourself. These trolls are loud, proud, and openly busy hating on people every day. 

But compare them to Kirrill Fafengut, the Russian mobster who has hijacked my old maloneymedical.com site. (Godaddy post here). He is successful only because he is anonymous. If he openly hawked his scams, nobody would come. The whole purpose of his online presence is to hide who he is and what he's doing. He's the worst possible community member, a pickpocket con artist who just wants to steal your credit card numbers. I don't see any reason to allow him to continue to function using Amazon, Google, Godaddy, and Wordpress. These businesses host him, provide him with all his tools, and all claim to have no ability to stop him.

Removing anonymity would take Kirrill out of the internet community. He cannot exist in a world where the men he steals from can track down who he is and where he lives. (I have his address and phone number on the other post, but he's in Nowhere, Russia. So unless he pisses off Putin, law enforcement can't get to him until he leaves the country.)

No, we won't get a police state online. 

Now, I know the First Amendment folk will hate this line of reasoning. Let me say this before you send me your anonymous hate mail. If you can't be identified, then you're a coward. Sending someone your identifying information is the definition of someone who will moderate his speech. If you know you can be "seen" then you won't say the filthy things that only live in your unconscious mind. And honestly, a little self-control, a few less swear words, and a little more thought wouldn't hurt your point.

Bystanders Count

If we remember back to the idea of going into a business and seeing someone being harassed, chances are that it would be another customer who helped stop it. So be that customer. Call companies on lax enforcement. Shop at places that have management that care about us. 

No, we don't want to live in a world where we can be harassed anywhere, anytime, and pay for the privilege. We need to find our own way back to civility. The one thing I'm proud of during my own past harassment was that I almost never (there was one exchange I regret) resorted to profanity with any of my attackers. Even people who sent me death threats. We're adults, and someone needs to start acting like the adult in the great big internet world. 

  






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Is the Deal With Fopobiacne Secrets? Scam? Sadly, Yes.

I just had another "random" person mention Fopobiacne Secrets on my comments page today. Since it seemed spammy, I deleted the comment. But it made me think that Fopobiacne Secrets is paying people to spam the internet with this product. So I decided to go looking and see what's going on. First, going directly to their official website is a weird experience. It's not a secure site, and hasn't been verified online, so it feels sketchy (I know, I use google, and I do so because they're verified and have the best security on the planet).  Most product pages feature a one page click through process. You see the product, read the reviews, and buy or pass on the product. Not on the Fopoiacne Secrets page. The top of the page warns "This is not for everyone!" then in the text they say, " Fopobiacne Secrets  is the best choice for you." So which is it? Not for everyone or the best choice for everyone? If you press the continue button, you

Godaddy and the Russian Mob, or why maloneymedical.com is now a scam.

I apologize to those of you who have been confused by my sudden interest in promoting Viagra. It’s not me. It’s the Russian Mob using maloneymedical.com to rip people off. Yes, I’m taking legal action. But the law is slow and people are getting hurt and confused. (My current website is naturopathicmaine.com , but if you’re confused, just email me. Or use your phone for what it was intended and give me a call.) Please don’t assume I’ve decided that erectile dysfunction is my guiding passion going forward. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. In November of 2017, I stopped paying on maloneymedical.com . It was an old domain, and I foolishly thought because it had my own name in the title it would be worthless to anyone else. How wrong I was. Godaddy auctioned off my domain to the highest bidder. He took maloneymedical.com , added a fake copy of my old website using Wordpress, hosted the new fake website on Amazon, and tried to hide himself by using Godaddy’s evil twin D

Why Didn't Doctors Catch Rainè Riggs' (Bernie Sanders' Daughter-In-Law) Neuroendocrine Cancer?

Short answer: Neuroendocrine Tumors and cancers (NET) are an extremely rare orphan disease. Longer answer: It sucks to get an orphan disease that few doctors have ever seen. NET is less than 2% of overall cancers. It affects fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S. So it's a zebra, not a horse. (For those unfamiliar with medical euphemisms, if you look out in a farm field you expect to see a horse, not a zebra. Young doctors are famous for trying to say patients might have a rare zebra disease. The overwhelming majority of patients don't, they have much more common horse diseases.) In recognition of this fact, the neuroendocrine community uses the zebra to increase awareness about the disease. The symptoms of Neuroendocrine problems can show up anywhere in the body, most often in the gut. They are nonspecific enough they can be mistaken for many, many other things. It sucks even more to get the even rarer aggressive, systemic form of an orphan disease. Rainè Riggs had the mos