Skip to main content

Why Doesn't Eating More Solve Cachexia (Weight Loss From Cancer)?

When cancer patients complain of losing weight, they are told to go home and eat ice cream. But this advice doesn't work. Why?

The loss of weight and muscle mass during cancer has less to do with calories and more to do with the process of fighting cancer. One of the things that happens is that the body starts to use its own muscles to provide essential amino acids for defense. The process of eating your own muscles leads to increased fatigue, less activity, and more muscle loss from inactivity. It's a downward spiral.

But simply adding more calories isn't going to reverse that cycle. The body needs amino acids, not calories. Providing the body with specific amino acids, or taking a hormone that forces the body to build lean muscle, may provide more benefit than eating more.

Even adding drugs may not help. Two drugs, Megace and THC were not effective at increasing quality of life. Megace did give patients more fat, and THC did help appetite, but neither significantly changed the disease process.

In comparison, a testosterone derivative Oxandrolone did help people build a little muscle mass. The complete information on these trials can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3106221/pdf/nihms276439.pdf

Another path to avoiding weight loss is decreasing inflammation, with interesting trials on things like turmeric and omega 3 fatty acids. The process of decreasing inflammation can change the way the body processes the amino acids.

What's missing from the current discussion is any mention of the bacteria of the gut, which provide one third of daily protein. When these are maximized they increase protein absorption and decrease inflammation. In my book Tending Your Internal Garden I give a brief overview of the fantastic rain forest that lives inside us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Godaddy and the Russian Mob, or why maloneymedical.com is now a scam.

I apologize to those of you who have been confused by my sudden interest in promoting Viagra. It’s not me. It’s the Russian Mob using maloneymedical.com to rip people off. Yes, I’m taking legal action. But the law is slow and people are getting hurt and confused. (My current website is naturopathicmaine.com , but if you’re confused, just email me. Or use your phone for what it was intended and give me a call.) Please don’t assume I’ve decided that erectile dysfunction is my guiding passion going forward. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. In November of 2017, I stopped paying on maloneymedical.com . It was an old domain, and I foolishly thought because it had my own name in the title it would be worthless to anyone else. How wrong I was. Godaddy auctioned off my domain to the highest bidder. He took maloneymedical.com , added a fake copy of my old website using Wordpress, hosted the new fake website on Amazon, and tried to hide himself by using Godaddy’s evil twin D...

What Is the Deal With Fopobiacne Secrets? Scam? Sadly, Yes.

I just had another "random" person mention Fopobiacne Secrets on my comments page today. Since it seemed spammy, I deleted the comment. But it made me think that Fopobiacne Secrets is paying people to spam the internet with this product. So I decided to go looking and see what's going on. First, going directly to their official website is a weird experience. It's not a secure site, and hasn't been verified online, so it feels sketchy (I know, I use google, and I do so because they're verified and have the best security on the planet).  Most product pages feature a one page click through process. You see the product, read the reviews, and buy or pass on the product. Not on the Fopoiacne Secrets page. The top of the page warns "This is not for everyone!" then in the text they say, " Fopobiacne Secrets  is the best choice for you." So which is it? Not for everyone or the best choice for everyone? If you press the continue button, you...

Will Vaccine Herd Immunity Eradicate More Illnesses?

The concept of herd immunity leading to disease eradication is simple. More vaccines, less disease, right up to the point of everybody gets vaccines, no more disease. But that's simply wrong. It's not because herd immunity doesn't help decrease disease, but because the idea of herd immunity is based on too-simple math. We can all get the idea easily. In a homogenous human population, there should exist a level of vaccination at which no more disease can be transmitted. Notice the fatal flaw is not in the concept, it's in the word "homogenous." Human populations will never be like bricks or milk cartons. You can't just line them up and expect everyone to be the same. So the concept of hitting a magic point and having that point mean no more disease is a mathematical graph, not a human reality. But it's such a nice graph. You can see a version here . The more you vaccinate, the fewer cases. But if you look at that graph, you see something like m...